Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

»÷µåºí¶ó½ºÆà ó¸®¿Í ¶óÀ̳ʰ¡ Áö¸£ÄÚ´Ï¾Æ¿Í ÀüÀåµµÀçÀÇ Àü´Ü°áÇÕ°­µµ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ

Effect of sandblasting and liner on shear bond strength of veneering ceramic to zirconia

´ëÇÑÄ¡°ú±â°øÇÐȸÁö 2021³â 43±Ç 1È£ p.6 ~ 12
±è±â¹é, ±èÀçÈ«,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±è±â¹é ( Kim Ki-Baek ) - Daejeon Health Institute of Technology Department of Dental Laboratory Technology
±èÀçÈ« ( Kim Jae-Hong ) - Catholic University of Pusan College of Health Sciences Department of Dental Laboratory Science

Abstract


Purpose: This study aimed to compare the shear bond strength between zirconia cores and veneer ceramics as per the sand blasting and liner treatments.

Methods: The following 4 groups of zirconia-veneering ceramic specimens were prepared: (1) Group I, untreated; (2) Group II, with 110 ¥ìm aluminium oxide (Al2O3) sandblasting; (3) Group III, with liner (IPS e.max ZirLiner; Ivoclar Vivadent); and (4) Group IV, with 110 ¥ìm Al2O3 sand blasting and liner. Surface roughness was measured for all the prepared specimens, and the surface morphology was observed using a scanning electron microscope. All the samples (n=40) were fixed with measuring jigs, and shear bond strengths were obtained using a universal testing machine with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The shear bond strength data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and t-test. The post hoc comparison was performed using the Tukey¡¯s test (¥á=0.05).

Results: A significant difference in the surface roughness was observed between the specimens of groups I and II (p<0.05). Surface treatment with liner and sandblasting showed higher shear bond strength between zirconia core and veneering ceramic (p<0.05).

Conclusion: The sand blasting and liner treatment increased the shear bond strength between zirconia core and veneering ceramic.

Å°¿öµå

Liner; Sand blasting; Shear bond strength; Veneering ceramic; Zirconia

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI